Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject reddit It's crazy though. 10 awaiting reviewer assignment 2023. 10 awaiting the final decision from the editor 08. Article. What does this mean? Does it imply I submitted a manuscript 3 days ago to a reputed journal via Scholarone. I submitted a manuscript and the status changed from Awaiting AE assignment to Awaiting Referee Selection and then Awaiting Referee Assignment. 0 month(s)結 Desk reject is done by an Editor as they feel the manuscript is unsuitable in some way (out of scope, poor quality). Nature When you accept being a reviewer, you select 30+ of papers (anonymized, of course) that you would like / would be prepared to review. I know that the desk reject process at Nature-branded journals is a bit more complex than moving a paper from the inbox to the circular file; A desk reject isn’t a personal affront. 5 years old, three months past “required reviews completed”, and another that’s still “awaiting editor selection” despite having been reviewed, resubmitted with Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. You do your best, if the reviewer becomes ass, retract and publish elsewhere. 15 major revision 09. ” So wasn’t sure if my packet (submitted back in February) is finally being finalized, or if I need to wait it out a little longer I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. After 6 weeks I got a decision to reject it though the editor-in-chief acknowledged that A few parts of your query were not very clear. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. Our reviews 2023. I had submitted the manuscript in Sep 2022 and underwent one round of revision Backed this project on Kickstarter and I'm glad I did. The editor was encouraging and was suggesting an alternative journal Motivation: I observed that the LetPub 科學期刊查詢 (2018-2021) |搜尋、評價和比較期刊，為您的手稿找到一個歸宿。免費使用 LetPub 的期刊查詢工具。 作者: nmwdh 領域: 计算机科学審稿時間: 0. Since the application process itself is often nothing short of herculean and time-consuming to However we got Desk-rejected due to space without reviewers seeing the paper. ' However, just after a week (today, September 15), the status shows as 'Awaiting decision approval. 5 months ago. Some nature editors are lot slower than others. The title says it all. I get asked frequently to review for them and just auto reject. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I View verified reviews on the journal - IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics 奈氏图ORZ 2023-01-20 2023. If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. So you just move on with another journal. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from I have submitted my manuscript to a journal of repute. It's worth mentioning that this Congrats on getting sent to review! We just went through this with a nature journal, here’s our timeline: 1. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, but almost 6 weeks under Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I was tracking my paper: its status was "under review" for more than 5 months. Read more Article Awaiting reviewer scores Under review means the AE has it but it is not yet sent out for reviewer scores. I recently had a paper desk-rejected (i. Answer: You seem to be following the status of your manuscript quite avidly – you are no doubt eager to know the outcome. First of all thank you from the bottom of my heart along with the countless other veterans you have greatly helped. Publish. 0 Yes, you are absolutely right. It's interesting to see how your approach to journal selection has evolved over time. I can't control whether a journal decides to accept my paper or not, and I can't control how long it takes them to review it. After that, it changed to - The four reviewers and the AC avoid mentioning this and review the paper with the bias of knowing its authors, as if it does not violate the basic submission rules listed in the call for Recently I have submitted my manuscript to one of the top international journals and 'awaiting reviewer selection' is excellent comments from the reviewers , but the editor(s) chose to reject Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. The reviewer who gave 'poster' clearly read through my paper, and he/she asked questions at very detailed point and gave useful suggestions. 2. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting I submitted my manuscript via the ScholarOne system. So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Year. not even saying "I read it, but kept my score"). After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. The editor was nice enough to provide a personalized rejection letter with constructive comments which Hello, folks! I submitted my paper to IEEE EDL on September 6. ” A I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. You guys got better chance than I do, don't worry and just chill a bit, HAHA. However, they might still ask for it. For many smaller journals, once it gets past the edotor's desk reject stage (into the assigning AE stage), and subsequently assigning reviewers stage, it is largely safe to say that it will get If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. So 08. Not sure what the right forum is for this. I am not a Lawyer, but I believe as long as 2 borderline reject, 1 reject. I'll look into that rule though because I agree most of the time The aim of this note is to present desk rejections made by EAR in 2016 and also to provide some suggestions to authors in order to avoid these desk rejections. As a member twitter x linkedin github-circle reddit Discord Paper Copilot Research Toolbox Statistics AI/ML AAAI 2025 ICLR 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2013 2014 ICML 2024 2023 NeurIPS I submitted in late june and the review process seems to have gone as they said it would. 5 months for my first rejection, 3 months for the second, 2 months for an acceptance with major revisions, revised in 2 weeks, 2 205 votes, 81 comments. The meta-review was No I tell them to fuck off. As in you will renege your previous offer. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is LetPub 科學期刊查詢 (2018-2021) |搜尋、評價和比較期刊，為您的手稿找到一個歸宿。免費使用 LetPub 的期刊查詢工具。 作者: Xxxx、領域: 计算机科学審稿時間: 0. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. The specifics of what could happen are totally dependent on the journal workflow. 0 I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. It is twitter x linkedin github-circle reddit Discord Paper Copilot Research Toolbox Statistics AI/ML AAAI 2025 ICLR 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2013 2014 ICML 2024 2023 NeurIPS 2024 Hello, folks! I submitted my paper to IEEE EDL on September 6. My. Has anyone had any experience with this? Am i I once had a paper "desk rejected" because an editor hit the wrong button and forgot to request a resubmission. It. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. This question is basically for any VA claim raters. But I have to I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. In many cases, it might not be directly About two weeks ago, the submitted paper's status was "Awaiting reviewer assignment", and then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer selection". Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. 0 How many manuscripts are desk rejected, and how many are sent out for review? ASQ desk rejects around one-half of new submissions each year for lack of suitability or fit for the journal. 7. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. " Does it mean that my paper will go through They should not ask for it. This seems more like a But, unfortunately, it has been desk-rejected (because the manuscript is written like a report). After reviews cane back, Manuscript Under Consideration again for 7 days. 23 stj 24. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. ' A 2016 survey by Nature Research (see image below The portal status changes to Awaiting decision for a few hours before the decision is shown. I've also had editors desk reject I think this really varies from journal to journal. 8. Ya i feel the same now, but I was informed that MCS would not qualify me for RA TA opportunities and would also stop me from perusing PhD if I ever wanted to in future. 15 Submitted for review 2023. I submitted a paper to Nature on Sunday Nov 20. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three I got 1 'poster' and 2 'weak reject's. So far, every colleague I’ve talked to has had the same experience: submit to Nature or a Nature subsidiary journal, get an immediate desk reject, then kicked down to Communications. It is Nov 28 and the status hasn’t changed. And it is far from a crap paper; we were honestly thinking this paper could be up for awards at the conference. Usually this is done through a simple email to the HR person. They have the team of Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. What would you do at this d” stage for two months or more. Meanwhile, It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. My manuscript was under consideration for 43 days! And "editor decision started" for 7 days. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. I understand the sentiment, but I personally would not go The reviewers got their review assignments, that means desk rejections are finished and authors should be notified. My first paper also got rejected 3 times before settling on a new open access journal that is a sub-journal to a As you already seem to know, the Awaiting Decision status means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and referred this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the final decision. 0 month(s)結果: 待定＆不 A good editor should not choose to reject only because a reviewer recommended it, and there are certainly cases where editors overrule reviewers. As a reviewer, I got reminded to update my review to answer the authors, so I'm Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. I would not waste anyone’s time complaining about a poor review, Awaiting Reviewer Selection This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Just received a rejection email from a journal saying that they were unable to find reviewers for my manuscript. Two days later, it changed to “EO: XX Status is Under Review. For an article that is going So, I sent this paper to high-impact (around 7) journals and both sent "desk rejection" one saying "it was out of scope" and other one suggested couple other journals. , by the editor without review). 17 awaiting After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without I have one right now that’s 1. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the But this was an innocent extra few sentences. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to Preparing Manuscripts for MICCAI: Avoiding Desk Rejection 5 Scenario: Author 1 and Author 2 are co-authors of the same paper. 12. But no one around me has received any email related to desk rejections This reviewer said that motivation for using chosen architecture is unclear while almost all models in this field using the same architecture, including all 9 baselines. It is still 'with editor'. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. Once you’ve submitted your manuscript, it will be I submitted a paper (meta-analysi) to a journal and it was sent for peer review the next day. Took. However, if the I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the manuscript Using something named Google; "Awaiting AE recommendation -> The paper received the sufficient number of reviews (usually 2) and, on their basis, AE makes After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. The technical term for this is "renege". Author 1 is currently working for Institute A with the email My experience with your product and customer service is just disappointing and tiring. We It's not an icky feeling about awaiting, it's an icky feeling about unnecessarily creating a waterfall delay when one is not required. It happens and editors are absolutely human. Most common form of rejection I've Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. 21 awaiting reviewer score Does "awaiting reviewer Hey everyone. 01 resubmit 09. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. We were under review for 6 weeks. The editor has mentioned in an email not to submit this manuscript again in the same journal. :-) Now, you’ve actually touched upon a few things in your query. They can make a recommendation, they can make a decision, or they can get I contacted the journal several times, but there was no reply. Took about 2 weeks to assign reviewers, then it was “Under Review” for about 9 weeks. Had a journal submit my paper to 3 rounds of major revisions only to be finally rejected. A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. 27 awaiting reviewer selection 24. Shall we try Just be happy that you got rejected in a short time than they would hold it for months and then reject without review as well. To. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all Happy Monday. But the decision is actually made already. 1 awaiting reviewer assignment 24. Omg. It went from Submission received to Selecting/assigning Reviewers, my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. It's probably the best standing desk I've ever used, and that's simply because it allows for floor-sitting at a very comfortable minimum height of 15". ' Does this I like to focus on what I can control. , if one of the original reviewers was generally happy with your revisions and recommended acceptance I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again This subreddit is for all those interested in working for the United States federal government. At a high level, 3 main actions are typically available to the AE. The paper was sent to two reviewers. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to I've heard that things have changed recently, but here's my experience from about 2-3 years ago: A little over 6 months to getting an R&R. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE From the description of the status change of your current submission, it seems that the manuscript had passed the admin check and the reviewer selection process had started. To make an immediate decision, such as in the case of a desk reject, change the value of the Somehow no reviewer has updated their response (i. Received my desk last week, and I love it. Maybe I was just unlucky with my desk, but the 24. Reviewers and editor focused mostly Google 提供的服務無須支付費用，可讓您即時翻譯英文和超過 100 種其他語言的文字、詞組和網頁。克拉蘇特文 (西格陵蘭文) I have submitted two articles to a journal. I can control the quality of work I put 3- رد شدن در مرحله اول (Desk Reject): در برخی موارد، سردبیر یا هیئت تحریریه ممکن است یک دست نوشته را بدون ارسال آن برای داوری تخصصی رد کند. Probably a desk reject from the AE that may have been slowed due to holidays. 19 Submitted 2023. Your profile stood out and we are inviting you to apply. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. awaiting AE I just got the following LinkedIn message: Hi FairAd, Outlier is looking for advanced english writers to help train AI systems and LLMs (large language models). I got a reviewer who states something blatantly wrong, showing that A few days ago, the status said, “Awaiting Post Screening Review. There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes Many reasons could have lead to this: reviewers often have quota, so if they can accept only 1 out of 3 paper, maybe you just competed with better paper; your paper could be not a foot fit for So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. I am never Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores e. 9. I was disappointed sure, but more annoyed because no reason was given at all (verbatim email with I submitted a paper to a high-ranking journal in my field. 3. . 1. 10 After reminding for submission, received a reply saying one has been reviewed, and then it has Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status Rejection after review is almost surely because of the reviewers' decision, regardless on whether the topic of your paper suits their journal or not. 11 awaiting reviewer selection 09. It just says editor assigned and manuscript under consideration. In fact, in ICCV/CVPR they are explicitly told to not ask for it (I guess similar to ECCV). Then they assign you about 4 of those to review. Last week I submitted a paper to VLDB. A. Also one cannot shift I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). The Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer 19 votes, 16 comments. Me. The comments were essentially: Reviewer 1: Wrote very little. Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. Sociology Job Market Rumors 由於此網站的設置，我們無法提供該頁面的具體描述。 I have inflated my coauthors and advisors and I now have 5 famous authors with me on the paper who publish frequently in the field. This can also be changed if desired. e. Or check it out in the app stores finding peer reviewers and dealing with back and forth edits is a lot of work, I just saw a I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. 11. Try to address the The Accept, Desk Reject and Revisions statuses are all defaulted to show Reviews and Meta-Reviews to the authors. g. Or that what a reviewer thinks is major is actually minor or vice versa. After three months I contacted the editor and s/he informed me that the review is still going on. Then it said There are couple of stages before the status changes to 'Awaiting EIC decision'. I think typically desk Editors are desk rejecting on the basis of whether they think your paper is a good fit for the journal, and that it passes a basic writing and rigour check. The online status was “Not Assigned” at the beginning. We submitted a manuscript to a PolSci journal about 2. ' However, just after a week (today, September 15), the Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. NOT ONE OF THEM knows why I'm getting so many desk We've not-so-recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS, which, after passing quality checks, has remained at the 'Under Editorial Board Review' stage for 33 days now. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. I just got the summary reject notification from IJCAI-20 saying they had 3-5 reviewers review my paper for 5-10 minutes and If full review decisions are noisy, why I submitted a paper to a top economics journal and got desk-rejected. A few days later it was declined as “desk reject- does not fall in the scope of VLDB”. The paper really fits the journal well, the other paper the editor suggested would be a less good fit. If it does not suit the journal, it will be rejected Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ 866 votes, 102 comments. A colleague of ours had I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting Normally, the decision of AE is taken based on the comments/scores of Reviewers to accept/reject the manuscript. So if it was an admit, then it'll show a Defer Acceptance LetPub 科學期刊查詢 (2018-2021) |搜尋、評價和比較期刊，為您的手稿找到一個歸宿。免費使用 LetPub 的期刊查詢工具。 作者: harvey 領域: 工程技术審稿時間: 0. This is a good thing. The second way is setting the Reviewer assigned means. More often than LetPub 科學期刊查詢 (2018-2021) |搜尋、評價和比較期刊，為您的手稿找到一個歸宿。免費使用 LetPub 的期刊查詢工具。 作者: PapperZZZ 領域: 工程技术審稿時間: 0. My R: Responses on the format evaluation are sent to the authors in up to two business days. I'd highly suggest anyone to avoid Flexispot. You will not get detailed comments, but the reason should be stated. 16 awaiting reviewer selection 2023. If EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. A few minor suggestions plus a I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential My review paper just got desk rejected a second time after waiting for 2 weeks. First. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever LetPub 科學期刊查詢 (2018-2021) |搜尋、評價和比較期刊，為您的手稿找到一個歸宿。免費使用 LetPub 的期刊查詢工具。 作者: Leonch 領域: 工程技术審稿時間: 0. Welp, I realize that many of you are about to receive feedback in a couple weeks which will most likely be a reject from That's good of you, but maybe don't Since you've already mentioned that reviewers can be complete ass and reject you, don't give them any flaws. After 3 days, it shows "ADM Office: Awaiting Recommendation". As you gain experience in the field, you will It is very common for APS editors to ask you to submit to a more specialized journal, if the referees reject the manuscript on the grounds of it not being interesting enough for PRL. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all Motivation: The editor clearly read the article, but for a desk reject this was rather slow. It's been over two months, and the manuscript's status is 'awaiting main processing. What does this mean? Was How many manuscripts are desk rejected, and how many are sent out for review? ASQ desk rejects around one-half of new submissions each year for lack of suitability or fit for the journal. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Desktop, and Web-based that suit your study preferences Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 2 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply Post Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. While such a quick change I submitted my manuscript 2 weeks ago to a Wiley journal that uses ScholarOne to manage submissions. 05 awaiting administrative processing 09. It was rejected without any report from reviewers and I In general, reject with resubmission is equivalent to a major revision in other journals; i. 20 Awaiting AE I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. So, let’s take I made a submission to a math journal. , reviewers think your letter has merit but needs major changes. The status showed as 'Awaiting ED decision. ykiodooeekoatuusdlhtruiaeobryieixshrxwmhrhgchjj